A philosophical thriller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb7dc/bb7dcc44faa7a7544db07afebe409b2dc20133a3" alt=""
I must confess that I did not entirely comprehend the ethical justification for Dragomiloff’s sentencing himself to death. London ends the debate pretty abruptly in order to get on with the action. It also seems the simplistic philosophy of the Bureau members could be summed up merely in one sentence: “Never break your word.” The fuzzy logic of the book, however, little hinders one’s enjoyment of its suspenseful story. The cold, calculated way in which the members of the Bureau deliberate life and death is years ahead of its time, and quite prescient in its foreshadowing of World War I. The execution of the book, however, never quite lives up to the promise of its audacious concept. Perhaps that’s why London abandoned the novel before completion. London’s writing ends at page 109, with Fish taking over until the book’s end at page 162. The writing style of the two, to Fish’s credit, is indistinguishable, but Fish greatly rescues the plot of the novel from stagnation. Up to the point where the torch is passed, London has offered the reader a repetitive series of killings, interspersed with periodic truces in which the characters gather in a spirit of mutual brotherhood and discuss philosophical matters as if they were the ancient Stoics. In the back of the book there are three pages of notes sketching how London intended to finish the novel. Fish thankfully does not slavishly defer to the master’s outline, but provides his own ending which is an improvement over London’s original plan.
The Penguin Classics edition of this book opens with an introduction by Donald E. Pease which is an almost unintelligible mess. If you absolutely feel you must read this introduction, by all means read the novel first, otherwise Pease will ruin it for you.
The Assassination Bureau, Ltd. is not one of London’s best novels, but it is certainly deserving of the resurrection so admirably accomplished by Fish. Despite its shortcomings, it does entertain, and London deserves to be commended for attempting to elevate the murder thriller genre by injecting it with a healthy dose of philosophical food-for-thought.
If you liked this book, please follow the link below to Amazon.com and give me a “helpful” book. Thank you.
http://www.amazon.com/review/RIGHVQ6DM67CW/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
No comments:
Post a Comment